Surprise! Big media ignore the real Russian scandal by Susan Stamper Brown

Journal/Website: 
GOPUSA.com
Article Type: 
Commentary
Published Date: 
Friday, October 27, 2017

While the mainstream media is chasing their tail about supposed Trump-Russia collusion, the scandal involving Uranium One unfolds to expose a Clinton-Russia connection as well as a stunning coverup by the Obama administration.

Susan Stamper BrownRather than reporting real news, they continue to churn out phony news that Russia swayed the 2016 election with Facebook ads and a hodgepodge of other thus-far debunked Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy theories.

The Clintons' chief political go-to guy Mark Penn recently disproved the conspiracy theory that Russia swayed the 2016 election with $100,000 in Facebook ads. Penn wrote in The Wall Street Journal that in the end, only $6,500 was spent on "actual electioneering" and most ads "did not solicit support for a candidate."

Even if $100,000 was spent on actual electioneering, compare that to the Clintons' multi-million-dollar influence-peddling scheme going on while Russia was conspiring to grab 20 percent of U.S. uranium reserves with the acquisition of Uranium One.

As I wrote in a March column, Uranium One is a Russian-owned uranium mining company that lobbied the Obama State Department through a firm co-founded by Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta.

Uranium One fell under the corporate control of Russia's atomic energy agency Rosatom through a series of transactions approved by Hillary Clinton's State Department, effectively giving Russia control of 20 percent of U.S. uranium — while a flow of cash found its way to the Clinton Foundation.

All told, Newsweek reports $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation or its initiatives from those linked to Uranium One. Former President Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank promoting Uranium One stock with ties to the Kremlin.

https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/921532552657211393

Additionally, the chairman of Uranium One is a close friend of the Clintons and is on the board of the Clinton Foundation, according to Peter Schweizer, author of Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.

Fast forward to now.

Enter: Rod Rosenstein, Andrew McCabe, Robert Mueller and James Comey — the same folks investigating the so-called Trump-Russia collusion investigation were also involved in Uranium One.

DOJ documents disclose the investigation was ultimately supervised by Rosenstein and McCabe. Robert Mueller was FBI director when the probe began and James Comey was director until Trump fired him.

We now know the FBI was aware of multi-faceted Russian wrongdoing long before the Uranium One nuclear deal was approved.

The Hill reports the "FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews."

Investigators also knew "Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns," The Hill reports.

Apparently, the Obama administration was desperate to keep this under wraps and allegedly threatened an FBI informant to remain silent. Fox News reports that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has asked the DOJ to "lift an apparent 'gag order' on the FBI informant who allegedly was 'threatened' by the Obama administration to stay quiet."

All that, while we were told there was nothing to see here.

Too much was at stake. Hillary was supposed to win in 2016. Covering up this scandal was just as important to Obama's legacy as lying about Benghazi was to winning his re-election.

In the end, the DOJ managed to whisper out a vague press release before Labor Day 2015, mentioning a plea agreement and a four-year sentence for a handful of wrongdoings. Basically, a hand slap, despite mountains of evidence collected. Furthermore, the final investigation didn't mention Obama's DOJ "slow-walked" the probe, despite serious national security concerns. Of course, the Clintons got a pass with no mention of influence peddling or how the Clinton Foundation benefited.

The mainstream media's silence on this scandal is damning and yet another reason why most Americans don't believe much of what they say.

Written by Susan Stamper Brown

Susan Stamper Brown lives in Alaska and writes about culture, politics and current events. She is a regular contributor to Townhall, The Christian Post, Right Wing News and GOPUSA. Susan’s nationally syndicated column is published in scores of newspapers and publications across the U.S.She writes about politics, culture and media and was selected as one of America’s 50 Best Conservative writers for 2015 and 2016.

This commentary was originally published on GOPUSA.com on October 24, 2017.

Copyright ©2017 Susan Stamper Brown

Your rating: None Average: 5 (3 votes)
Comments on this post

Media’s hobby and favorite pastime!

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a pastime is “a diversion or recreation which serves to pass the time agreeably; an activity done for pleasure rather than work; a hobby; a sport, a game.”

Yes, the media’s hobby and favorite pastime is now Trump-bashing! They even go so far as to think up ways of concocting non-stories to generate more unfavorable headlines about President Trump!

Here’s an example: The headline from an October 25, 2017 Newsweek story by Beatrice Dupuy claims “Donald Trump a Loser in New World Leader Approval Ratings Poll.” This non-story does nothing more than generate another unfavorable headline about President Trump and promote Ian Bremmer’s Eurasia Group. Bremmer originally forecast that Donald Trump wouldn’t win the Republican nomination, and Trump did. Then Bremmer forecast that Trump wouldn’t win the presidential election, and he did… So why is it news what Bremmer and his Eurasia Group think about President Trump when their tract record of forecasts hasn’t been very accurate?

It’s because the media’s hobby and favorite pastime is now Trump-bashing, instead of doing their job of objectively reporting news!