FDA Changes in Informed Consent Requirements for Experimental Treatment

Author: 
John H. Boyles, Jr., MD
Article Type: 
Correspondence
Issue: 
March/April 1998
Volume Number: 
3
Issue Number: 
2

Dear Editor,

Congratulations on your Editor’s Corner article in the Fall 1997 issue of the Medical Sentinel. I am rapidly reaching the point of being afraid to criticize my government for fear that I will end up in jail.

We recently had an excellent meeting in Columbus, Ohio planned and executed by Nino Camardese, M.D. Leora Traynor, M.D., passed out the enclosed letter [i.e., “FDA and Dr. Shalala Strip Defenseless Patients of Protections of Informed Consent During Experimental Research” in which the FDA has amended informed consent regulations to permit experimental human research, in this case, “a blood derivative” to be given seriously injured patients with severe blood loss and shock in the emergency room of 35 hospitals nationwide]. It appears that the government hasn’t done enough by conducting experiments on humans. I don’t think the importance of Dr. Traynor’s short talk sunk into the participants of the conference. As I read this, the government will be able to conduct research for the maker of this blood derivative, so that it can be marketed worldwide. The obvious profit potential is enormous...

John H. Boyles, Jr., MD
Centerville, OH

Originally published in the Medical Sentinel 1998;3(2):38. Copyright © 1998 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

 

 

 

 

No votes yet

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.


The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time


Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.


Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.


The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...


The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.


Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...


Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.


The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...


It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!


Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?


The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.


Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!


The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...


...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.


Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?