Medical Staff Bylaws — An Outline

Author: 
Jose Guerra, Jr., MD
Article Type: 
Report from the States
Issue: 
March/April 1999
Volume Number: 
4
Issue Number: 
2

In response to the corporatization of medicine in general and our local hospital administration trying to eliminate the contract with ER physicians in January 1997 in particular, the Medical Staff passed several Bylaws Amendments by greater than the two-thirds majority vote of active staff members in June 1997.

Slightly paraphrased for this article these Bylaws:

1) Add to the Existing Preamble to provide the professional and legal structure for Medical Staff operations and relations with the Board of Trustees, and are mutually binding.

2) Successor in Interest: These Bylaws and the clinical privileges accorded under them, will be binding upon the hospital and Medical Staff of any successor in interest in this Hospital.

3) Effect of Hospital’s Affiliation: Affiliation with other hospitals, healthcare systems or similar entities shall not in and of itself affect these Medical Staff Bylaws.

4) Medical Staff Role in Exclusive Contracting: The Medical Staff shall review and make recommendations to the Board of Trustees regarding quality of care issues related to the following:

a) The decision to execute an exclusive contract in a previously open department or service; or b)  to renew or modify, or c) to terminate an exclusive contract in a particular department or service.

Should the Board of Trustees decision on such issues be in variance with Medical Staff recommendations, the Board of Trustees shall make specific, written explanations for its decision.

5) Exceptions to Hearing Rights: (There are no exceptions to fair hearing rights.) These Bylaws are not subject to waiver by contract or otherwise between hospital and other parties.

We are continuing to work with the administration and the Board of Trustees regarding these Bylaws Amendments. Mr. Andrew Schlafly, a legal advisor to AAPS, is representing the Medical Staff. The AMA-Organized Medical Staff Section published in mid-1998, a “Physicians’ Guide to Bylaws,” is an extremely useful document from which the above-mentioned Bylaws Amendments were taken nearly verbatim.

Dr. Guerra is the Chief of Staff at Wood County Hospital in Bowling Green, Ohio, e-mail: jbguerra@wcnet.org.

Originally published in the Medical Sentinel 1999;4(2):65-66. Copyright©1999 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

 

No votes yet

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.


The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time


Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.


Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.


The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...


The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.


Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...


Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.


The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...


It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!


Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?


The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.


Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!


The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...


...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.


Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?