RE: Dr. Meyer's Book Review of Coolidge by Sobel

Author: 
Andrew L. Schlafly, Esq.
Article Type: 
Feature Article
Volume Number: 
1
Issue Number: 
1

Dear Dr. Meyer,
I am an avid reader of the Medical Sentinel, and want to compliment you on your recent contribution. Your book review of Sobel's Coolidge, as published in the January/February 1999 issue of the Medical Sentinel, is the best book review I have read in recent memory. In a concise manner, you conveyed a powerful message about the benefits of political inactivity. Your statistical references about Coolidge winning 17 out of 19 elections and using an average sentence length of nearly one-half that of Wilson were fascinating.

Interestingly, the English language lacks a proper word to describe the Coolidge approach to government. Walter Lippmann reluctantly used the term "political inactivity," while recognizing that Coolidge "worked hard at inactivity." Two other English words, forbearance and quiescence, more closely describe Coolidge's approach, but they also constitute imperfect descriptions.

The lack of an English word to describe Coolidge's political philosophy speaks volumes about the misguided historical attitudes towards government. While Sobel calls Coolidge an "enigma," the real enigma is mankind's irrational thinking about government.

Andrew L. Schlafly, Esq.
AAPS General Counsel
Wayne, NJ

----------------

Dr. Meyer Responds:

 

Dear Mr. Schlafly,
Thanks for the kind note. I appreciate the opportunity that the Medical Sentinel has given me to write about things that are dear to me. I'm able to review books with a slightly different perspective than I can for Sacramento Medicine. You can read my Sacramento Medicine reviews on my web page: www.delmeyer.net or you can review my previous three years of editorials on my family web page: www.groupemeyer.com/del.

I enjoyed meeting you and finding out your relationship to a woman I admire and that she's doing well. Look forward to seeing you at the next meeting.

Delbert H. Meyer, MD
Carmichael, CA

[We presume, of course, that Dr. Meyer is referring to Phyllis Schlafly, Director of Eagle Forum and the great vanquisher of the ERA.---Editor.]

Correspondence originally published in the Medical Sentinel 1999;4(3);77-81. Copyright©1999 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

No votes yet

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.


The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time


Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.


Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.


The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...


The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.


Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...


Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.


The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...


It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!


Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?


The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.


Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!


The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...


...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.


Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?